Tuesday, June 21, 2011

A True Sciolist: Donna Garner - 2

By Divya Mangwani
May 30, 2011 - Gulen and Charter Schools



I will continue to give my personal answers to Donna Garner’s groundless claims. In my last article, I briefly mentioned the superficial and mostly wrong perceptions and knowledge coming from Donna Garner, who even lacks the basic information despite continuously labeling some charter schools as “Gulen Charter Schools”. 

Claim: “I received this note from a local pastor:
Hi Donna,
The local Harmony Science Academy is obviously one of these schools.  One of our church families had a daughter there, but the Muslim influence and foundation of beliefs and practices led them to remove her.
Thanks for bringing attention to this.
R.” (Taken from her article on ISD Initiative website)

Answer: What a dubious and obscure claim! First of all, there is no name mentioned here. No name of the pastor or Harmony School, who has 33 campuses in Texas, is given. Why are you scared Ms. Garner? Do you think people will bug the pastor? Or you are just making up stories?

Looks like she is just making up brand-new stories. Secondly, I can also write similar things about any school or any other organization. “Hi Donna… The local elementary school here is one of these schools where you find child abuse. One of our church families had a son there, but the abusive manners of the teachers led me to remove my son.” Looks familiar right? I could have put a famous elementary school name and defamed their name.

Besides, if there were to be such influence, brainwashing or similar practices, some other parents would definitely pull out their kids and that would also hit the local and national headlines. Since it is illegal to teach religion in public schools, any contrary practice will put that school into trouble.

Before making an ambiguous claim, people should think twice, because these kinds of claims, without any backing factual data, could leave a permanent negative spot on the mentioned organizations.

Claim: Students in the Gulen (charter) schools celebrate various Turkish Muslim holidays (taken from her Education News article).

AnswerSuperficial claims are abound. This was another one I came up while reading Donna Garner’s stories.

According to my research, there is no such Muslim celebration at Harmony Schools. Moreover, Donna Garner displays her ignorance again. The term “Turkish Muslim holidays”, if two Muslim religious festivals are meant (Eid ul-Fitr and Eid ul-Adha) by this, is something non-existent and somewhat ridiculous concept. Muslims have two major religious holidays and you do not have to bring the adjective “Turkish” in front of the Muslim Holidays. On the other hand, such a celebration requires the witness of a couple of hundred students and some parents, administrators and other community members. At the end of the day, one would leak this “mysterious” and “secret” event to the media, wouldn’t s/he?

All these things point to one fact: Donna Garner is a couple of miles away from the facts. She just makes up the stories and throws mud on people. I would expect her to closely investigate the issue she is working on.

TO BE CONTINUED...

Friday, June 17, 2011

A True Sciolist: Donna Garner-1


By Dr. Kurt
May 24, 2011 - Gulen and Charter Schools

The charter school controversy is going on full throttle and some charter schools, infamously called Gulen Charter Schools, have recently become a scapegoat in this process.  After finding some information Peggy Littleton, I have turned my attention to other attackers. Recently, Donna Garner has made some buzz on Harmony Schools in Texas. She has some accusations on so-called Gulen Charter Schools at different internet sources and as a scholar, I made my own investigation with those schools and refuted Garner’s groundless accusations. Her knowledge in those issues is just superficial and she doesn’t even know  he simplest facts on neither charter schools nor Harmony Schools. That is why, henceforth, I will start calling her a sciolist (meaning “a person with superficial knowledge”).
Let us take a look at some of her accusations along with my findings consequent refutations. I will not provide the links for her accusations, but I will give the resources that she “contributes”. I will use claim-answer format to expose her sciolism:
Claim: "I imagine that many of these people (U. S. Congressmen Gene Green, Sheila Jackson Lee, Kofi Annan, Mayor Tom Leppert, Dr. Terri Grier, Texas Railroad Commissioner Elizabeth A. Jones, Bill White, Dr. Akbar S. Ahmed (Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies at American University), and James Baker) help to fund the Turkish charter schools where Islam is the predominant religion." (taken from her article onisdinitiative.org)
Answer: What an imagination (!), I should say. The names are so irrelevant that it is hard to find any logical relationship among each other. Besides, Dr. Grier is the Superintendent of Houston Independent School District (HISD). How come an ISD superintendent helps the funding of a charter school?  That is ridiculous. She has also no proof of such funding other than her wild imagination. Moreover, if a person shows up at the Gulen Institute, does it mean that s/he helps the funding of charter schools? What kind of correlation you establish here? Kofi Annan, former UN Secretary, has nothing to do with charter schools. He works for a Speakers Bureau giving keynote speeches around the world. This is pure ill intention to find such a relationship. I don’t want to go over the names separately, but two examples should suffice.
Claim: How would Turkish teachers (many here on visas) teach our American children about such historical events as the Holocaust? (taken from ramparts360.com) How could those Turkish teachers teach American children about the Constitution, Civil War and American History? (taken from the talk on City on a Hill radio)
Answer: Let me start with a question and a simple stat as an answer that I took from Harmony Schools officials: how many Turkish teachers are there at Harmony Schools teaching Social StudiesZERO. Ms. Garner is so ignorant that she is not aware of the simple easy facts. Yet, interestingly, she does not bother to ask school officials before she comes up with a conclusion. Please do not worry Ms. Garner. Our American History is told by local American teachers.
Addendum: On the Ghostfighters page, where you can find the same article that I got from ramparts360.com, on top of the headline, this sentence reads: “we are funding charter schools that teach the kids to kill us.” Another bold and reckless claim... Imagine a school where you teach your kids how to kill their parents. None of the students react this! None of the parents, fellow teachers or community members show any reaction to this! Is it possible? If there were such things at these schools, we would have heard this somehow and some way, right? Or at least we would have heard some attempts from elementary and middle school kids (!) to kill their parents. I am ashamed to talk about those baseless claims, but attacking innocent schools with a partisanship attitude is what people like Donna Garner do. I wish we could dwell on more sensible things. By the way, I found that I was not alone. More things could be found on Donna Garner on the internet.
Donna Garner is a rich resource in terms of superficial and false information. She is the embodiment of sciolist approach. I am planning to write more about her false claims and their answers.

Source : http://gulenandcharterschools.blogspot.com/p/donna-garner-true-sciolist-1.html

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Charter school eyes second role

By CHARLES LUSSIER
Advocate staff writer
Published: Jun 16, 2011 - Page: 1B

A new career-oriented charter school set to open in August may be joining forces with the Louisiana Department of Education to rescue the troubled Capitol High Academy.

The details are still emerging, but Nancy Roberts, executive director of the nonprofit group behind the new Career Academy, said the two sides plan to meet Thursday. “We’ve agreed in concept to a partnership,” she said.

Dennis Blunt, a member of the board of 100 Black Men of Baton Rouge, which won the charter to take over Capitol High in spring 2008, said 100 Black Men was formally alerted to the proposal late last week and would likely “wholeheartedly” support it.

The East Baton Rouge Parish school system, however, is not yet on board.

School Board President Barbara Freiberg said she’s concerned about having two schools run simultaneously by Career Academy, which the board granted a Type 1 charter to in May 2010.

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Landrieu chats with Avoyelles Public Charter School students by videoconference



MANSURA -- It's been a big week for a class of high school students at Avoyelles Public Charter School.

The class returned from a trip to Boston late Tuesday night. On Wednesday morning, they were in a videoconference with U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu.

Avoyelles Public Charter is one of a handful of Louisiana schools that Landrieu is "visiting" as part of National Charter Schools Week. The school in Mansura was founded 11 years ago.

"I'm a very strong supporter of public charter schools," Landrieu said. "It's incredible to think of the opportunity you have there in Avoyelles Parish. It's an opportunity opening up around the state."

"We are very fortunate," said school principal and founder Julie Durand. "It's an honor to be one of only a few schools chosen. I hope they know how special this was."

After some opening remarks and a brief talk with Durand about the school, Landrieu, D-New Orleans, took some questions from the students. The first was a subject of tremendous local interest in Avoyelles Parish -- a proposal to sell or privatize some state prisons, including Avoyelles Correctional Center in Cottonport.

"I am strongly opposed to the governor's plan to privatize prisons, but I don't have a vote in that," Landrieu said.

She said she has seen abuses in privately run prisons and expressed the thoughts of many parish residents -- that private companies are more interested in making money than public safety or rehabilitating

inmates.

The senator urged the students who are close to voting age to write Gov. Bobby Jindal and state legislators to express their opposition.

Landrieu addressed a question about high gas prices by saying America must diversify its vehicle-fuel needs to rely less on foreign oil. She said she supports using electricity and natural gas as alternate fuels, but that it will take time to move them into mass production.

"Even though it was nerve-racking, it was a very good opportunity for us all to experience this," said student Simone Swanier. "I felt lucky."

"It was interesting to hear her side of the story on some issues," said Leslie Saucier.

Other student questions dealt with potential flooding issues in Louisiana and when U.S. forces are expected to pull out of Afghanistan now that Osama bin Laden is dead.

Landrieu had to cut the session short to get to the floor of the Senate, where a bill she sponsored to reauthorize two programs of the Small Business Administration was being debated.

"I thought it was a really good experience to talk to her," said student Haylee Doyle. "She gave us some good answers."

Source : thetowntalk.com

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Sixth-grader at Abramson wins state science fair


By Marilyn Stewart
Contributing writer
Thursday, April 21, 2011
nola.com

Twelve-year-old Andre Johnson entered the state science fair for the first time this year and walked away with first place in the junior division. Now his eye is on an international competition this fall in Washington, D.C.
“It took practice, and it was hard work,” Andre said. “I had to believe in myself.”
Andre won the Greater New Orleans Science and Engineering Fair’s junior division before taking top honors in the mathematics category at the recent state Science and Engineering Fair at Louisiana State University. His win marks the 100th science competition award by an Abramson Science and Technology student since the Pelican Foundation Charter School opened four years ago.
The sixth-grader’s victory earns him a chance at an all-expense-paid trip to the Broadcom Math, Applied Science, Technology and Engineering for Rising Stars, or MASTERS, Competition in October. Thirty middle school students from across the nation will be chosen to compete for a $25,000 grand prize for education.
Andre’s experiment involved trial runs of a yellow toy car down an incline. He varied the height of the incline and measured the distance the car traveled off the ramp. In a second set of experiments he added weight by adding pennies, then made a comparison.
“I found out Isaac Newton was right,” he said.
Andre observed that the higher the incline, the greater the distance the car traveled off the ramp. He graphed his results, and in mathematical language, determined “the slope of the line.” The variance in height affected the outcome more than the change in weight, he concluded.
“Science fair is either the best, or one of the best ways, to teach the scientific method,” said Elkhan Akhundov, the school’s science research coordinator.
The scientific method, the organized testing of an idea through experimentation and observation, is the basic method in any research, Akhundov said.
“This introduces students to a simple method for carrying out research,” Akhundov said. “It gives them the blueprint for a path that takes them to a new invention.”
The Pelican Educational Foundation was formed in 2005 with educators from Louisiana State University, Southern University of New Orleans, Southeastern Louisiana University and the LSU Science Center in New Orleans. The foundation operates Abramson Science and Tech, its first school, and Kenilworth Science and Tech in Baton Rouge.
Pelican Foundation schools emphasize the integration of technology and digital arts in education, web-based training and monitoring, and collaboration with university professors and researchers for national and international science competitions. Orhan Kizilkaya, LSU professor with the center for advanced microstructures and devices and the department of physics, is president.
Cuneyt Dokmen, principal, said the science fair is valuable because it connects students to educators and resources at the university level. Partners include the University of New Orleans, LSU, Southern University at New Orleans and Tulane.
“Science fair is a tool,” Dokmen said. “It is additional support in making students aware of college opportunity. It is a tool to keep them academically challenged.”
Abramson graduates its first senior class in May with 27 students. The kindergarten through 12th grade has an enrollment of 550. Saturday school, after school tutoring and additional help on core subjects are standard. Teachers visit with parents in the home.
“We want to challenge students according to their level,” Dokmen said. “These children are smart. If they are already at mastery level, we want them to go for advanced.”
Abramson students took home 19 awards in this year’s city-wide science fair, and earned five of the nine awards offered at a competition this year sponsored by SUNO.
The school is located on the site of the former Marion Abramson Senior High School, 5552 Read Blvd. It is a Type 5 charter school and has open enrollment. Testing is not required for admission.
Andre’s win at the state science fair is another “first” for the school. Abramson came close two years ago when his brother, Michael Barnes, won fourth place in a computer science entry.
“He told me when I won, ‘Good job, little bro,’ ” Andre said. With a grin, he added, “Sometimes, I tease him that I passed him up.”

Source : nola.com

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Online charter school starts up in Louisiana

BY JESSICA GOFF
THE DAILY IBERIAN

Monday, April 4, 2011


A new Baton Rouge-based statewide online charter school began accepting applications statewide on Friday.

The school, which is the first of its kind for the state, will be holding information sessions in several Louisiana cities for parents interested in enrolling their students in grades kindergarten through 12 into the program next fall.

The closest session to the Teche area will be held in Lafayette on April 12.
he school, Louisiana Connections Academy, was approved by the Louisiana Board of Elementary and Secondary Education in December and is predicted to enroll 500 students statewide in its first school year.

The school is one of 11 charter schools approved to open in the fall, the state department said.

There are 90 charter schools currently in operation in Louisiana.

The school is operated through the Friends of Louisiana Connections Academy but like all charter schools must demonstrate state-mandated academic performance and accountability requirements to maintain its BESE approved charter status, the department said.

The school advertises itself as “a challenging, K–12 curriculum developed by leading education experts- with instruction from state-certified teachers experienced in online instruction.”

Connections Academy is a national nonprofit company that operates free online public schooling in nearly 20 states.

The program combines learning in a non-traditional out-of-classroom atmosphere with curriculum that includes art, physical education, music, home life, foreign language, technology literacy depending on state issued curriculum.

For more information on the Louisiana Connections Academy visit www.connectionsacademy.com

Source: THE DAILY IBERIAN

Friday, April 1, 2011

The Changing Face of American Education

Posted by Secretary Arne Duncan 
on March 28, 2011



One of the greatest challenges facing our country is the coming retirement of more than 1 million baby-boomer teachers. This challenge has presented us with a once in a lifetime opportunity to help reshape education in America by recruiting and training the next generation of great American teachers.
Teaching is a rewarding and challenging profession where you can make a lasting impact. Teachers have a positive influence on students, schools, and communities, now and into the future. Schools across the nation are in need of a diverse set of talented teachers, especially in our big cities and rural areas, and especially in the areas of Math, Science, Technology, Special Education, and English Language Learning.
That’s why the department launched the TEACH campaign -- a bold new initiative to inspire and empower the most talented and dedicated Americans to become teachers. We know that next to parental support, there is nothing more important to a child’s education than the quality of his or her teachers.
Many of you are already thinking about becoming teachers. The TEACH campaign provides tools at your fingertips to navigate the academic and professional requirements that will credential you to succeed as a teacher in one of our schools. TEACH.gov features an online path to teaching and over 4,000 listed, open teaching positions.
In addition to information on job postingsteacher prep, and financial aid, prospective candidates can watch testimonials from current teachers. Each one was looking for a professionally challenging and financially rewarding career that would allow them to bring their passions, their lives, to work every day.  Go toTEACH.gov and listen to their stories. 
We’re also setting up TEACH Town Hall events around the country to encourage discussions in communities and at colleges for those who are preparing to step into the workforce. Help us spread the word about teaching careers. If you know someone who is considering becoming a teacher, send them to TEACH.gov so they can learn about the resources available for their state and district. Also be sure to let them know that we have an application called Raise Your Hand on Facebook that allows prospective teachers to join a community of teachers across the country and ask about teaching as a career.
Together, we can change the face of American education. We can recruit the next generation of great American teachers.
Arne Duncan is Secretary of Education

Friday, March 18, 2011

Most New Orleans charter schools outperform traditional schools, study finds

By Andrew Vanacore, The Times-Picayune
Friday, March 18, 2011
A new analysis of standardized test scores in New Orleans shows a majority of the city's independent charter schools are improving student performance in reading, math or both, at a notably faster rate than traditional schools.
That's an important finding considering the city and state have placed enormous confidence in the success of the charter model. The state's Recovery School District, which took over most city schools after Hurricane Katrina, has turned a majority of those over to charter organizations that are responsible for their own curriculum and day-to-day operations. The Orleans Parish School Board, which kept a handful of high-performing schools, has turned most of those into charters as well.
"It's incredibly useful data," RSD Deputy Superintendent Kevin Guitterrez said. "It tells you much more about which schools are really driving student achievement."
The new analysis of student test scores, from Stanford University, will also help shape the school system's future. The nonprofit group New Schools for New Orleans commissioned the study to help decide which charter organizations will get some of the $28 million in federal grant money available to start up additional schools over the next five years.

Stanford's Center for Research on Education Outcomes, or CREDO, analyzed test scores from 44 charter schools. Twenty-three met eligibility requirements to win grant money, with test scores improving faster than scores at schools run by the RSD. The difference had to be statistically significant in either reading or math.
Another 12 charter schools fell into the "neutral" category, showing no significant difference in scores for either category.
Nine other schools missed the bar completely, with scores in at least one category lagging behind those of direct-run schools. While the ranking doesn't necessarily mean a school is failing, three of those schools have already turned in their charters.
To advocates of entrepreneurial schools, that's the way a city's education system should work. Schools that succeed should be rewarded with responsibility for more students, while those that fail should be jettisoned.
But that approach still has its detractors, and the new testing data won't end the debate over how the New Orleans school system should be governed in the future.
Some schools that fell short in the study defended their performance.
Echoing other administrators at schools that didn't make the cut, Roslyn Smith, board president of McDonogh 42, pointed out that the Treme Charter School Association took over a failing school rather than starting one with new students. It's been handling students who are sometimes years behind grade level and doing it without the type of fund-raising resources some other charter schools have.
"We took whoever could walk, crawl or run through the door," Smith said. "We have to survive on what the state gives us and it's harder to do it that way."
Much the same is true at Sojourner Truth Academy, said Principal Channa Cook, adding that test scores often don't reflect the "range of psycho-social challenges our students face including trauma, homelessness, violence, and legal challenges."
UNO Charter Network spokeswoman Vera Billy said test scores shouldn't be the only barometer for success. Thurgood Marshall, for instance, graduated all of its seniors last year and took in more than $800,000 in scholarships for them, she said.
CREDO took pains to even the playing field when analyzing test scores in New Orleans. Researchers did not simply compare one school to another. Instead, they matched up students in charter schools with "virtual twins" at a direct-run school to compare students from roughly equivalent backgrounds.
For every charter student, the group found one or multiple students at direct-run schools that had lost pupils to charters in the same area. That ensured a similar population of students. Within that pool, they made sure the students matched up in a slew of different categories, including race, gender and socioeconomic background. They also made sure the paired students began with exactly the same test results.
CREDO Director Macke Raymond said the group was able to find matches for 85 percent of New Orleans charter students and extrapolate for the rest.
The findings in New Orleans appear to buck the national trend.
CREDO did a similar study in 2009 using data from 15 different states and Washington DC. The group found that only 17 percent of the charter schools provided superior results to traditionally run schools. At the same time, 37 percent did significantly worse.
New Orleans likely stands out in part because of the tremendous national attention and funding that arrived after Katrina, said Paul Peterson, who heads the Program on Education Policy and Governance at Harvard University.
Along with Katrina-related recovery dollars, the school system benefited from a large corps of new teachers from Teach for America and other programs.
Peterson also singled out Louisiana for putting a strict system in place to approve charters. In the vast majority of cases, the state's Board of Elementary and Secondary Education has not approved a charter that doesn't have the recommendation of the National Association of Charter School Authorizers. Indeed, some local charter groups have been frustrated by the high bar set by the state.
New Schools for New Orleans will use Stanford's data and other criteria to decide which schools should get grant money to expand in the fall, as well the 2012-2013 school year. It plans to announce its decision some time in the next week or so.
Four charter organizations have applied for the first round of funding: KIPP New Orleans is preparing to open two new elementary schools and FirstLine will either open a new high school or take over a failing one. Both organizations met New Schools for New Orleans' requirements in the CREDO study.
There are also two new charter groups looking for cash to help get off the ground: Crescent City Schools, which is taking over Harriet Tubman, and Educators for Quality Alternatives, which is opening NET Charter High School. New Schools for New Orleans will review their applications for grant money through interviews and a review of their school plans.




Source : nola.com

Monday, February 28, 2011

Charter Schools Independent and Innovative


classroomCharter Schools are independent public schools that are free to be more innovative and held accountable for improved student achievement. They foster a relationship between parents, teachers, and students to create an environment in which parents are more involved, teachers can be more innovative, and students are provided the structure they need to learn.

Charter schools operate from 3 basic principles

  1. Choice: Parents select the school their child attends. Teachers and principals choose to work in the school.
  2. Flexibility: Charter schools are free to make timely decisions about developing curricula, structuring the school day and hiring teachers who meet the needs of their students.
  3. Accountability: Charter schools operate within a multi-tiered accountability system – to parents, to authorizers via a performance-based contract, to the state and lenders – that leads to quality schools and high achievement.

There are five different types of charter schools

  • Type 1 – Charter with local school board (new start-up)
  • Type 2 – Charter with BESE (new start-up or conversion)
  • Type 3 – Charter with local school board (conversion)
  • Type 4 – School Board Charter with BESE (new start-up or conversion)
  • Type 5 – Charter with BESE (pre-existing public school under the jurisdiction of the RSD)

History of Louisiana’s charter schools

Louisiana’s Charter School Law was originally enacted in 1995 (Act 192) as a pilot program allowing up to eight school districts to volunteer to participate. These districts could either grant charters to eligible groups or apply to the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) to operate a charter school themselves.
The law was substantially revised in 1997 (Act 477) to allow all school districts to participate, but the number of charter schools statewide was capped at 42. The 1997 act also allowed an “appeals-type” procedure under which an eligible group could submit its charter proposal directly to BESE if a local school board failed to approve it or if the local school board placed conditions on the approval of the charter which were unacceptable to the group.
In 2003, a constitutional amendment (Act 1293) and four bills (Act 9, Act 260, Act 381 and Act 944) impacted the operation of charter schools. The constitutional amendment authorized the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education to take over failing public schools or provide for others to do so; it also authorized BESE to receive, control and spend the state and local per pupil share of the Minimum Foundation Program (MFP) for those schools. Companion legislation (Act 9) spelled out the procedure BESE is to follow to implement the provisions of the constitutional amendment; created a new “Type 5” category of charter schools as one option BESE has for providing for the operation of a failing public school it takes over; and includes special provisions for the creation and operation of Type 5 charter schools.

Louisiana’s Charter School Law

  • Download the full text of Louisiana's Charter School Law through 2009 (PDF)
  • Download the full text of the Charter School Bulletin (PDF)

Saturday, February 26, 2011

A Vivid Example of Putting Foolish Labels: “Gulen Charter Schools

By Harmony Parent
December 6, 2010 - Harmony Parent

A recent article on Leave Charters Alone grabbed my attention about charter schools, their relative accomplishments within their short history and the baseless attacks on these schools some of which have been deliberately labeled as Gulen Charter Schools.
Author starts his/her article with an allusion to the recent movie (Waiting for Superman) about charter schools: Stories related to charter schools and their self-described movement has lately been featured in the media probably more than it has been for the past five years combined. This increase in public attention is indebted to many factors such as dedication of updated resources to the movement by the Obama administration and the latest documentary by Oscar winning director Davis Guggenheim, “Waiting for 'Superman'”. As it has been the case wherever money is involved, the issue stirred a hot debate, emotions ranging from characterizing charter schools as the new savior of the broken education system to the latest demons to hijack money from our much-needy schools.


….. The charters that achieved the reputation of being “high-performing” paved their success in this “high-accountability” period. Today there are dozens of these schools such as nationwide KIPP schools, California’s Green Dot public schools, Texas’ Harmony public schools or New York’s Harlem Success Academy. These charters have long track records and are subject to increasing public scrutiny.
After giving a few reasons for the students re-entering traditional public school system, the author unfolds a recent misconception about a group of charter schools: On August 17, 2010, USA Today ran a story on Texas’ acclaimed Harmony Public School. In the article, Ed Fuller, a University of Texas-Austin researcher, was quoted "It's not hard to be 'Exemplary' if you lose all the kids who aren't performing" (www.usatoday.com/news/education/2010-08-17-turkishfinal17_CV_N.htm).
More than one month later Harmony was featured on Texas Tribune on September 27, 2010 with a title “What Drives High Achievement At Harmony Charters?” (www.texastribune.org/texas-education/texas-education-agency/what-drives-high-achievement-at-harmony-charters-/). This time Fuller conceded that the percentage (Fuller reported the network’s attrition rate as 50% in USA Today) was merely an estimate based on an informal review of high school-level data, not a comprehensive study. Fuller also said that he did not find that the students who left had significantly lower test scores than those who stayed. This is an example of the same account reported in two completely different ways.
How come a researcher like Ed Fuller falls into the trap of declaring unverified data? Is it because of some sort of pressure on him to publish those bogus data? Or is it something else that we don’t know? Why did he make his claims so confidently on national level and then pulled in his horns on statewide level? Besides, which data are we going to trust from now on? What is worse, there are substantial amount of people basing their accusations and attacks on these unverified facts, using such data or similar ones to attack certain charter schools and label them ‘Gulen Charter Schools’. This ‘Gulen Charter School’ concept, by the way, has recently become a popular tag. There are plenty of amateur free-to-buy websites and blogs that have started an unprecedented smear campaign on so-called Gulen Charter Schools. It is not easy task to determine their main causes, because, so far, in charter movement history, no such smear campaign has launched on any charter school group with all various blogs and amateur websites. Ironically, this campaign is performed against one of the most successful charter school chains in Texas or in any other state. It is also not fair to call these schools “Gulen Charter Schools” giving credit to Fethullah Gulen who repeatedly insisted that he has no ties with these schools in any way (see the same USA Today article). If there is a success story, it belongs to teachers, parents, administrators and of course the students of these schools. We should refrain from putting simplistic labels such as Gulen Charter Schools.
On one occasion, I saw a mini-article claiming that Math-Count is a Gulenist organization. That is just plain ignorance, not knowing the years-long American tradition. When you combine your ill-intention with utterly ignorant approach, you just come up with nothing but some embarrassment. How can someone be filled with so much hatred and ignorance at the same time? Like I said above, it is not easy to find out the main motives of people attacking charter schools and labeling them with something (Gulen Charter Schools) Americans have never heard until recently. Maybe this labeling (Gulen Charter Schools) is the 21st century version of a new opposition in American society. We have already wasted the 20th century with labeling people, groups and organizations and this century will put the burden on the shoulders of those labeled ones: get rid of your “Gulen Charter School” or any other label if you can!
After seeing Ed Fuller’s initial accusation and subsequent deflation, I wonder if other accusations of those attackers (on the same blogs) are the products of same helter-skelter approach. The attacks and accusations are solely based on rumors with no academic credibility. At the end of the day, it is curious to know the thing operating behind the curtain. Are “Gulen Charter School” attackers doing this just because they are against charter schools or they really care about our children’s education or they want to add more fuel to their Gulen antagonism? Throughout the history, seemingly innocent intentions have turned out to be a part of a bigger plan.
To make long story short, having served and positively changed the lives of hundreds and thousands of children, charter schools, just like any other schools, deserve to get rid of foolish labels put by clumsy researchers and ill-intentioned people.

Article from Harmony Parent

Thursday, February 10, 2011

BESE honors teacher, students from charter school

  • Advocate Capitol News Bureau
  • Published: Jan 21, 2011 - Page: 8A

  • Students from a Baton Rouge middle school and a Baton Rouge teacher were recognized Thursday by the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
    A robotics team from Kenilworth Science & Technology Charter School was given a resolution from BESE, which sets state policies for public schools statewide.
    The team, called “Alienbots,” earned first place for overall performance during the state’s First LEGO League Championship in New Orleans.
    The students were also picked as the best rookie team.
    The competition was held in November.Students built autonomous robots to perform tasks related to a biomedical and engineering theme.
    Teams were also required to present judges with a biomedical problem and proposed solution. Students were rated on teamwork and professionalism.
    Members of the Kenilworth team are Jabir Abdullah, Fazil Ozcelik, Matthew Kingsley, Emma Lacy, Dylan Aguiluz and Nathaniel Batiste.
    The coach is Irfan Demir, a computer teacher and robotics coordinator at the school.
    BESE also recognized Laura Hill, a teacher at Cedarcrest-Southmoor Elementary School, who recently won a Milken National Educator Award.
    The award includes a $25,000 gift from the foundation, which issues the honors annually to teachers around the country.
    Hill teaches fourth grade. In 2009 all of her home room students passed the Louisiana Educational Assessment Program.
    Passage of the test, which measures math and English skills, is required for promotion to the fifth grade.
    The state’s other Milken winner, Renee Lee Ward, was also recognized by BESE.
    Ward teaches at Delhi Charter School in northeast Louisiana.

    Source : 2theadvocate
    Videos for this success : www.kenilworthst.org





A New Fictitious Phenomenon: Gulen Charter Schools

By Dr. Kurt
January 28, 2010
Gulen and Charter Schools

In the last two years, a new trend has been started by some mysterious bloggers later joined by a few self-identified scholars with PhDs. They came up with a brand-new term, a totally new coinage, for the charter school world: Gulen Charter Schools. While the early-bird alarmist bloggers tried to attract people’s attention to those so-called Gulen Charter Schools by claiming that Fethullah Gulen involved in the foundation and administration of some US charter schools, others – specifically the academics – based their arguments on these blogs as if the latter were highly credible sources. Moreover, in an effort to make their claims look authentic alarmist bloggers employed Charter Schools’ open-to-public data, such as tax returns and H1B visa applications which indeed have been scrutinized by local and federal government agencies many times for various procedural reasons.

The question here is what charter schools are and in what sense they could be compared with the schools founded throughout the world by the people inspired by Fethullah Gulen.
According to uscharterschools.org;
Charter schools are nonsectarian public schools of choice that operate with freedom from many of the regulations that apply to traditional public schools. The “charter” establishing each such school is a performance contract detailing the school’s mission, program, goals, students served, methods of assessment, and ways to measure success. The length of time for which charters are granted varies, but most are granted for 3-5 years. At the end of the term, the entity granting the charter may renew the school’s contract. Charter schools are accountable to their sponsor– usually a state or local school board– to produce positive academic results and adhere to the charter contract. The basic concept of charter schools is that they exercise increased autonomy in return for this accountability. They are accountable for both academic results and fiscal practices to several groups: the sponsor that grants them, the parents who choose them and the public that funds them.
Uscharterschools.org also provides some other definitions of charter schools from various independent sources such as this one:
Charter schools are semi-autonomous public schools, founded by educators, parents, community groups or private organizations that operate under a written contract with a state, district or other entity. This contract, or charter, details how the school will be organized and managed, what students will be taught and expected to achieve, and how success will be measured. Many charter schools enjoy freedom from rules and regulations affecting other public schools, as long as they continue to meet the terms of their charters. Charter schools can be closed for failing to satisfy these terms. (“Charter Schools Description”, Education Commission of the States, 2005)
These definitions clearly state that charter schools are public institutions owned by the public, operated for the sake of public by using public money, and responsible to the institutions representing the public. They have to be transparent – as dictated by the laws in the US – open to public by providing equal opportunity of enrollment to anyone legally eligible for the application to the school, cannot discriminate even by requiring certain test scores as a requirement for enrollment. Charter schools are operated by contractors for a specified term and the contract could be renewed based on the schools’ performance. They are accountable for their academic and fiscal performances to the institution (state, local school board etc) who granted them this privilege in the name of public. This means the contractors do not really own the schools but operate them for a pre-arranged time period. Then, if the contract is renewed they are good to go; but if not, it turns into a regular, government operated public school overnight.
Academics studying Gulen-inspired schools founded throughout the world by the people who were inspired by Fethullah Gulen’s teachings have coined the term Gulen Schools (or Gulen-inspired schools/institutions) for convenience purposes (see Ebaugh, 2010, p. 96). Although Fethullah Gulen does not accept any affiliation to his name, whether it is people or institutions, it has been useful to call them Gulen Schools. Dr. Thomas Michel describes Gulen Schools as follows:
[T]he schools inspired by Gülen’s educational understanding are not religious or Islamic. Instead, they are secular private schools inspected by state authorities and sponsored by parents and entrepreneurs. They follow secular, state-prescribed curricula and internationally recognized programs. (Michel, 2006, p. 111)
Gulen-inspired schools, unlike charter schools, are private schools financed by tuition fees and donations of local businessmen who pledged their support at school fundraisers that are held on yearly basis. They are open to public as long as students could pay the tuition and at the same time pass a certain qualification test held either by the school itself or – in Turkish case – by the state. For those who are well qualified without proper financial support, there are scholarships such as tuition waivers and even stipends. Moreover, these private schools are predominantly boarding schools where there usually is no option other than living in the dormitories under the tutelage of school administration.
The business circles of the movement are the main sponsors of these schools, supporting them financially until they are able to raise their own revenues through school fees. In each country, the community works in co-operation with the local authorities, who often provide logistical assistance and supervise the curriculum:
Some schools are completely built and funded by businessmen and industrialists, while some are joint ventures between the state and the trusts. The state provides the building, electricity, water, etc., and the trusts provide teaching, the teaching staff, and all educational materials and resources.
Some are eventually completely funded by student fees. They work as non-profitable companies or trusts, that is, all the income incurred goes back to the students again as educational investment (new teaching materials and resources such as books, computers, software; and facilities such as labs, gyms, hostels, residence halls, etc).
Ruth Woodhall says, “Every school has its own independent accountants and accountancy system. They are all accountable to the local authorities (the state) and the trust’s inspectors, and comply with the state and international law.”[1] Ian G. Williams adds that the schools do receive summary and unpredicted inspections.[2] On the other hand, a qualitative field research about Kenya’s Gülen-inspired schools suggests that the schools have been functioning not only as a secular alternative to religious, Christian missionary schools and Islamic schools, but also as barriers to potential ethno-religious conflict between Kenya’s local Christian tribes and its politically empowering Muslim minority.[3]
Charter schools allegedly affiliated to Fethullah Gulen and mistakenly called Gulen Charter Schools have none of the abovementioned characteristics that Gulen-inspired schools display. They are neither founded as private institutions, nor funded by private entrepreneurs and they are not allowed to charge any sort of tuition fee let alone putting enrollment requirements to select students that have promising academic potential. They don’t administer any entrance or qualification test. Unlike Gulen-inspired schools, charter schools have almost no donations from generous businessmen. If there is any donation, it probably comes from certain foundations like Dell Foundation or Gates Foundation within the scope of a larger project or initiative such as T-STEM. The budget of a charter school largely consists of the state money that is paid annually to each and every charter school in the nation. Charter schools also may not make zip code distinction as public schools and more than half of their students, statistics show that, come from disadvantaged areas. There is also no boarding school option as in the example of Gulen-inspired schools. Charter schools are day schools; therefore there are no dormitories that students can stay overnight.
Here remains a question: Is there any Gulen-inspired school in the sense that I have described above? I can say “Yes,” this question. There are indeed handful Gulen-inspired private schools in the United States. One of them is the Pinnacle Academy of Northern Virginia (DC metropolitan area). Lately they have attracted the attention of the national and international media after President Obama hosted Inaugural White House Science Fair. Pinnacle team developed a digital and three-dimensional model of “Yeshilist,” an imaginary city that anticipates the accommodation needs of citizens who lose their homes during an earthquake and they introduced their project to President Obama at the White House.
Another Gulen-inspired school is Brooklyn Amity School, a well-known school by its achievements at some of the top academic competitions such as Science Olympiad, Math Contests, Robotics Competitions, Art Contests, and Future City Engineering competition.
I guess there are five or six Gulen-inspired schools in the US and those schools have no connection with some other charter schools called mistakenly Gulen Charter Schools. As I stated in my article entitled Gulen Charter Schools, the fact that some people inspired by Fethullah Gulen work for a charter school does not necessarily make this school a Gulen Charter School.
Finally, I need to reiterate the fact that we should definitely make a distinction and put some space between Gulen-inspired schools and the non-existent concept of Gulen Charter Schools mistakenly claimed by some alarmist bloggers. I have described the nature of Gulen-inspired schools and their main differences from US charter schools. I hope self-proclaimed academics won’t fall into the trap of mistakenly-coined Gulen Charter Schools concept again.
[1] Ruth Woodhall, “Organizing the Organization, Educating the Educators: An Examination of Fethullah Gulen’s Teaching and the Membership of the Movement, delivered during “Islam in the Contemporary World: The Fethullah Gulen Movement in Thought and Practice” conference, Rice University, 12-13 November, 2005, pp.3-4
[2] Ian G. Williams, “An Absent Influence? The Nurcu/Fetullah Gulen Movements in Turkish Islam and Their Potential Influence upon European Islam and Global Education”, delivered during “Islam in the Contemporary World: The Fethullah Gulen Movement in Thought and Practice” conference, Rice University, 12-13 November, 2005, pp.8.
[3] Mehmet Kalyoncu, “Gulen-inspired Schools in the East Africa: Secular Alternative in Kenya and Pragmatist Approach to Development in Uganda”, delivered during “Islam in the Age of Global Challenges: Alternative Perspectives of the Gulen Movement” conference on November 14-15, 2008, Georgetown University, p.1

SOURCE: Gulen and Charter Schools

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Parents deserve charter choice

January 28, 2011
Palladium-Item

Opponents of charter schools in Indiana are saddled with a fundamental weakness in their argument against expansion of educational choices. They must persuade the public, and members of the Indiana General Assembly, that parents aren’t qualified to select the best learning environment for their children.
After all, parents aren’t forced to ship their children to charters. They choose to do so. …
Now, the General Assembly is debating whether more families should have the option of choosing a charter for their families. House Speaker Brian Bosma and other key legislators from both parties are pushing a bill that could greatly expand the number of charter schools in Indiana. Only 62 charters now operate in the state, in part because Statehouse Democrats used their majority in the House to attack educational options.
The legislation would give authority to a host of new sponsors, including a new state charter school board, mayors in cities of more than 35,000 people, and private, nonprofit universities.

Opponents are aghast that private universities would be allowed to sponsor charters. That’s another tough argument for the opposition to win.
However, one component of the legislation, although well intended, does present a problem. The bill would require districts to rent vacant school buildings to charters for only $1 a year. It’s certainly a challenge for charter school organizers to raise capital to obtain and often renovate buildings, but the state shouldn’t take away school boards’ ability to make decisions about how best to use public properties.
With that weakness noted, and with the understanding that charters are by no means a panacea to what ails this state’s educational system, the legislation deserves strong public support.

SOURCE: Palladium-Item

Sunday, January 23, 2011

Minnesota ranks first in 2011 charter school law rankings

January 23, 2011
Alexandria Echo Press

Minnesota has the nation’s strongest charter school law for the second year in a row, according to the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools’ second annual ranking of state charter school laws.
Mississippi’s new charter school law ranked last.
Measuring Up to the Model: A Ranking of State Public Charter School Laws analyzes the country’s 41 state charter laws and scores how well each supports charter school quality and growth based on the 20 essential components from the Alliance’s model charter school law.
“Minnesota tops the chart most notably because of its laws promoting quality and funding equity for charter schools,” said report author Todd Ziebarth, vice president of state advocacy and support, National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. “However, legislators could do more to ensure equitable access to capital funding and facilities for charter schools.”

Minnesota enacted the nation’s first charter school law in 1991. In 2009, Minnesota enacted a “second generation” charter school law that addressed a comprehensive series of measures to strengthen the accountability of authorizers, schools, and boards of directors as well as to enhance the innovation within charter schools.
“Our ongoing effort has been to enhance accountability, quality and innovation in Minnesota’s charter schools and authorizers – so we are extremely pleased to see that, for a second year in a row, Minnesota’s charter school law is ranked first in the nation, especially as we celebrate the 20th anniversary of the enactment of Minnesota’s first in the nation charter school law. The first in the nation ranking, however, does not mean that we cannot continue to improve our law. In fact, we will be introducing a number of proposals during this legislative session to continue to promote quality and accountability,” said Eugene Piccolo, Executive Director of the Minnesota Association of Charter Schools.
The new report captures all the legislative moves states made to be more competitive under the U.S. Department of Education’s Race to the Top program. As a result of positive policy changes made over the past year, Florida made the biggest jump from 2010, moving from number 11 to second place. Because of charter schools legislation passed in 2010, Massachusetts also made a jump, from number six to third place. And, the charter school legislation New York enacted in 2010 moved it from number eight to number five.
Conversely, the District of Columbia tumbled the furthest from 2010, dropping from the second to the eighth place. In addition, California fell from the third to the sixth position, Georgia fell from fourth to seventh, and Utah dipped from seventh to tenth.
As a new crop of governors and legislators prepare for the upcoming legislative sessions, the rankings provide clear indications of where some states excel and others come up short in charter school laws and offer a positive roadmap for how governors and legislators can take action to strengthen their charter school laws.
“High-quality charter schools start with strong charter school laws. Our state charter law rankings describe how laws can ensure charter schools are able to innovate in ways that boost student achievement while being held to high standards of academic, fiscal, and operational performance,” explained Peter C. Groff, president and CEO, National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. “The rankings and the model law developed by the Alliance and other key stakeholders are moving lawmakers in key states to make positive policy changes.”
The 10 states with laws shown to best support the growth of high-quality charter schools are: Minnesota, Florida, Massachusetts, Colorado, New York, California, Georgia, District of Columbia, Louisiana and Utah.
The report also found that 24 states and the District of Columbia still have caps that impede the growth of charter schools. In nine of these states, such caps are severely constraining growth: Arkansas, Connecticut, Hawaii, Idaho, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Carolina and Ohio. More than 420,000 students across the country are hoping for an additional seat at a charter school and there is no correlation between caps and school quality or student achievement. “These states should remove their arbitrary restrictions on charter growth,” added Ziebarth.
In addition, 10 states have still failed to enact a charter school law: Alabama, Kentucky, Maine, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, and West Virginia.
The complete analysis can be downloaded at the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools web site: www.publiccharters.org/charterlawrankings2011 . See detailed state-by-state summaries and color-coded maps of how states measure against each component at the http://charterlaws.publiccharters.org.
For more information on Minnesota’s charter schools, visit the MN Association of Charter Schools website: www.mncharterschools.org

SOURCE: Echo Press